Page 690 -
P. 690

16.2    Multiperiod Forecasts	 689

                              These VAR equations can be used to perform Granger causality tests. The
                         F-statistic testing the null hypothesis that the coefficients on TSpreadt−1 and
                         TSpreadt−2 are zero in the GDP growth rate equation [Equation (16.5)] is 5.91,
                         which has a p-value less than 0.001. Thus the null hypothesis is rejected, so we can
                         conclude that the term spread is a useful predictor of the growth rate of GDP,
                         given lags in the growth rate of GDP (that is, the term spread rate Granger-causes
                         the growth rate of GDP). The F-statistic testing the hypothesis that the coeffi-
                         cients on the two lags of GDPGRt are zero in the term spread equation [Equation
                         (16.6)] is 3.48, which has a p-value of 0.03. Thus the growth rate of GDP Granger-
                         causes the term spread at the 5% significance level.

                              Forecasts of the growth rate of GDP and the term spread one period ahead are
                         obtained exactly as discussed in Section 14.4. The forecast of the growth rate of
                         GDP for 2013:Q1, based on Equation (16.5), is GDP2013:Q102012:Q4 = 1.7 percentage
                         point. A similar calculation using Equation (16.6) gives a forecast of the term spread
                         2013:Q1, based on data through 2012:Q4 of TSpread2013:Q102012:Q4 = 1.7%. The
                         actual values for 2013:Q1 are GDPGR2013:Q1 = 1.1% and TSpread2013:Q1 = 1.9%.

	 16.2	 Multiperiod Forecasts

                         The discussion of forecasting so far has focused on making forecasts one period
                         in advance. Often, however, forecasters are called upon to make forecasts further
                         into the future. This section describes two methods for making multiperiod fore-
                         casts. The usual method is to construct “iterated” forecasts, in which a one-period-
                         ahead model is iterated forward one period at a time, in a way that is made precise
                         in this section. The second method is to make “direct” forecasts by using a regres-
                         sion in which the dependent variable is the multiperiod variable that one wants to
                         forecast. For reasons discussed at the end of this section, in most applications, the
                         iterated method is recommended over the direct method.

                   Iterated Multiperiod Forecasts

                         The essential idea of an iterated forecast is that a forecasting model is used to
                         make a forecast one period ahead, for period T + 1, using data through period T.
                         The model then is used to make a forecast for date T + 2, given the data through
                         date T, where the forecasted value for date T + 1 is treated as data for the pur-
                         pose of making the forecast for period T + 2. Thus the one-period-ahead forecast
                         (which is also referred to as a one-step-ahead forecast) is used as an intermediate
   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695