Page 737 -
P. 737

736	 Chapter 17  The Theory of Linear Regression with One Regressor

                         Equation (17.23) matches the definition of a random variable with a Student t
                         distribution given in Appendix 17.1. That is, by using the degrees of freedom
                         adjustment to calculate the standard error, the t-statistic has the Student t distribu-
                         tion when the errors are normally distributed.

	 17.5	 Weighted Least Squares

                         Under the first four extended least squares assumptions, the OLS estimator is
                         efficient among the class of linear (in Y1, c, Yn), conditionally (on X1, c, Xn)
                         unbiased estimators; that is, the OLS estimator is BLUE. This result is the Gauss–
                         Markov theorem, which was discussed in Section 5.5 and proven in Appendix 5.2.
                         The Gauss–Markov theorem provides a theoretical justification for using the OLS
                         estimator. A major limitation of the Gauss–Markov theorem is that it requires
                         homoskedastic errors. If, as is often encountered in practice, the errors are
                         heteroskedastic, the Gauss–Markov theorem does not hold and the OLS estimator
                         is not BLUE.

                              This section presents a modification of the OLS estimator, called weighted
                         least squares (WLS), which is more efficient than OLS when the errors are
                         heteroskedastic.

                              WLS requires knowing quite a bit about the conditional variance function,
                         var(ui ͉ Xi). We consider two cases. In the first case, var(ui ͉ Xi) is known up to a
                         factor of proportionality, and WLS is BLUE. In the second case, the functional
                         form of var(ui ͉ Xi) is known, but this functional form has some unknown param-
                         eters that can be estimated. Under some additional conditions, the asymptotic
                         distribution of WLS in the second case is the same as if the parameters of the
                         conditional variance function were in fact known, and in this sense the WLS esti-
                         mator is asymptotically BLUE. The section concludes with a discussion of the
                         practical advantages and disadvantages of handling heteroskedasticity using WLS
                         or, alternatively, heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors.

                   WLS with Known Heteroskedasticity

                      Suppose that the conditional variance var(ui 0 Xi) is known up to a factor of pro-

                         portionality; that is,

                      	 var(ui 0 Xi) = lh(Xi),	(17.24)

                         where l is a constant and h is a known function. In this case, the WLS estimator
                         is the estimator obtained by first dividing the dependent variable and regressor
   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742