Page 356 - Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system foundations for physical rehabilitation
P. 356

332	 Section III   Axial Skeleton                                                                                 L2
This relatively low pressure, combined with the hydrophilic
nature of the nucleus pulposus, attracts water into the disc.                                                   L3
As a result, the disc swells slightly when one is sleeping. When
one is awake and upright, however, weight bearing produces                                                      L4
compression forces across the vertebral endplates that push
water out of the disc.94 The natural cycle of swelling and                                                        L5
contraction of the disc produces on average a 1% diurnal                                                                S1
variation in overall body height.201 The daily variation has a
strong inverse relation to age. Karakida and colleagues used            FIGURE 9-38.  A midsagittal T2-weighted MRI scan of a 35-year-old
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure the variation               man with a history of recurrent low-back pain that is provoked by
in water content in the discs of a group of working persons             prolonged or repeated lumbar flexion. Evidence of disc degeneration
between the ages of 23 and 56 years old, with no medical                is indicated by a diminished (darker) signal intensity in the nuclear
history of low-back pain.100 Remarkably, significant diurnal            regions of L4-L5 and L5-S1. Posterior displacement or “bulging” of
variation in water content was found only in the discs of               the disc is also noticeable at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 junctions (arrows).
persons younger than 35 years of age. These findings are con-           (Image courtesy Paul F. Beattie PT, PhD.)
sistent with the fact that the water-retaining capacity of inter-       means used to stabilize the subject, and the tools used to
vertebral discs naturally declines with increasing age.6,14 The         measure the motion. Methods typically include the use of
relative dehydration is caused by the parallel, age-related             goniometers (manual, electrical, or fiberoptic), flexible rulers,
decline in the discs’ proteoglycan content.158,203                      or inclinometers or more sophisticated tools that employ
                                                                        three-dimensional MRI, planar and biplanar radiography, vid-
   A relatively dehydrated nucleus pulposus exerts less hydro-          eofluoroscopy, ultrasonography, and computerized analysis
static pressure when compressed.23 Once relatively depressur-           using electromechanical, potentiometric, optical, or electro-
ized, the disc may bulge outward when compressed, similar               magnetic tracking systems.*
to a “flat tire.” The older, degenerated intervertebral disc is
subsequently less able to uniformly cushion the vertebral                  The connective tissues within the vertebral column play a
body and endplates against compressive loads.145 As a con­              major role in limiting and therefore defining the normal
sequence, disc degeneration increases with age and affects              limits of motion across regions; selected examples are pro-
most persons, to varying degrees, over 35 or 40 years of                vided in Table 9-6. In cases of disease, trauma, or extended
age.78,100,158,164,206 A diagnosis of disc degeneration is most effec-  times of immobilization, these connective tissues may become
tively made using MRI, typically based on a diminished signal           abnormally stiff, thus interfering with normal kinematics.
intensity of the T2-weighted image (indicative of reduced               Understanding the structures’ normal function is a prerequi-
water content), loss of distinction between the border of the           site for the design of treatments aimed to increase interverte-
annulus fibrosus and the nucleus pulposus, nuclear bulging,             bral mobility.85
and loss of disc space.78,100,157,164 The MRI scan in Figure 9-38
shows diminished signal intensity between L4-L5 and L5-S1               Introduction to Spinal Coupling
along with nuclear bulging. Furthermore, a degenerated disc
may display circumferential, radial, and peripheral fissures            Movement performed within any given plane throughout the
(clefts) within the annulus.78 According to Adams, these fis-           vertebral column is usually associated with an automatic, and
sures can often be observed even in young adolescent persons.6          usually imperceptible, movement in another plane. This kine-
Excessive degeneration may also be associated with complete             matic phenomenon is called spinal coupling. Although spinal
depressurization of the nucleus in conjunction with delami-             coupling can involve both rotation and translation, more
nation of the annular fibers and microfractures of the verte-           clinical attention is paid to the rotational kinematics.
bral endplates.78 In some cases the internal disruption of the
annular fibers may lead to a herniation (prolapse) of the                  The mechanical explanations for the cause of most pur-
nucleus pulposus (typically posteriorly toward or into the              ported spinal coupling patterns are varied and typically
spinal canal). Remarkably, a significant percentage of persons
with observable signs of disc degeneration on MRI remain                *References 19, 20, 108, 121, 197, 198, 222.
asymptomatic, without experiencing continued mechanical
deterioration or loss of function.95 The important topic of
disc degeneration, including disc herniation, is described in
more detail later in this chapter.

REGIONAL ANATOMY AND KINEMATICS
ACROSS THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN

This section describes the anatomy and the kinematics
throughout the various regions of the vertebral column. For
each region, a maximum expected range of motion will be
cited, assuming a starting, neutral position (Figure 9-39).82,106,121
The reported range of motion in the literature is highly vari-
able, reflecting differences in research design and differences
resulting from the gender, age, and activity level of the sub-
jects.198 Data also vary for active and passive movements,
   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361